View without frames
UCLA School Mental Health Project
Center for Mental Health in Schools
How do I download this packet?
Continuing Education: Unit II
The result is that substantially more assessment is likely to occur in our nation's schools, and to take place in areas traditionally not assessed (such as the arts), using assessment strategies (such as performance assessments and portfolios) not typically used. States and local districts are reconsidering the models for systems of assessment and how assessment at the state and local levels can be coordinated to achieve the reforms desired in education...
How Does Reform of Assessment Fit School Reform?
Assessment reform should occur along with professional development, instructional development, and other strategies
designed to assure that all of the changes are mutually supported. Coordination of assessment reform at the national and
state levels with assessments at the local level is also important, so that each will present a coherent view of student
performance, not simply be "stuck" together.
Types Of Assessments
School Improvement Strategies
Improving student achievement can take place at each of these levels. Teachers work with an individual student in a
classroom, or revamp classroom-wide instruction based on an assessment. At the school level, educators use school
information to set long-and-short-range objectives and decide how to accomplish these. At the district level,
educators target particular areas of the curriculum for attention. At the state level, incentives for improving
instructional programs may be most important. School reform occurs at all levels of the educational system.
Useful Assessment Designs
The nature of information needs should form the basis for an assessment design. In a top-down model, policy makers
develop an assessment design that meets their needs, hoping the data may be useful by persons at lower levels. An
alternative is to build the assessment system needed at the local level, aggregating the information upwards to the
district, state and national levels.
Another model, based on the assumption that multiple approaches will allow different users' needs to be met, is to
develop a comprehensive assessment system using different assessment formats to meet different users' needs. Various
assessment strategies can be implemented together at the different levels to provide for the different information needs in
a coordinated, coherent manner (Darling-Hammond, 1994).
For example, local districts can adopt a portfolio system for improving instruction, while the state carries out
matrix-sampling across important standards. The information collected by the state can become part of the student's
portfolio, thereby strengthening the portfolio's quality. The state could also provide opportunities for teachers to learn to
score the open-ended written and performance assessments, thereby enhancing teachers' capabilities of observing and
rating student performances in their classrooms.
In this case, the elements of the system at the different levels build on and support the elements at other levels. It is also
anticipated that information collected at the different levels can be reported in a more understandable manner, since the
same standards apply in different ways. This assessment model enhances the reforms of schools so many desire.
Summary
References
Return to:
Student assessment is at the top of the list of things to tinker with by policy makers at the national and state levels, since
it is viewed as a means to set more appropriate targets for students, focus staff development efforts for the nation's
teachers, encourage curriculum reform and improve instruction and instructional materials in a variety of subject matters
and disciplines (Darling-Hammond & Wise, 1985). Assessment is important because it is widely believed that what gets
assessed is what gets taught, and that the format of assessment influences the format of learning and teaching. (O'Day &
Smith, 1993). The hope of policy makers is that changes in assessment will not only bring about the needed changes in
students, but also in ways schools are organized (Linn, 1987, Madaus, 1985). Interest in performance assessment has
also been justified on the basis that using such measures will promote educational equity (National Center on Education
and the Economy, 1989). Student assessment carries a heavy load these days!...
New content standards may require different assessment methods. Among the assessment techniques now being
considered are short-answer, open-ended; extended-response, open-ended; individual interviews; performance events;
performance tasks in which students have extended time; projects; portfolios; observations; and anecdotal records, in
addition to multiple-choice exercises. A broader repertoire of techniques is increasingly being used.
The information about student achievement needed at various levels of the educational system is different. Parents
have different needs than teachers, who in turn, have different needs than school principals. District administrators
need broader, system-wide information, while at the state level, there is concern about equity across districts and
identification of state priorities. Nationally, policy makers are concerned about differences between states and how
competitive American students are with their peers in other countries.
Typically, student achievement is measured with available student test data, often using information from district or
testing programs. Information collected less formally in classrooms is not typically included in school improvement
plans, even though such information could provide valuable insights into student learning.
This is indeed a time when American schools are being challenged to provide opportunities for students to achieve at
much higher levels. Assessment is viewed as one of the essential elements in assisting schools to address the standards
now deemed to be important in a manner that will help all students to achieve them. The major challenge for assessment
is to implement these additional assessments in a coordinated manner so that the amount of assessment is supportive of
the changes needed, not overly burdensome to teachers or students. Models for coordination assessment at the state,
district and classroom levels appear most promising.
Move on to:
Unit II Follow-Up Reading Continued
Contents of Unit II Follow-Up Reading
Unit II Main Menu