|
One of the resources provided by the Center are policy issues analysis briefs. These delineate ongoing issues relevant to MH in schools and addressing barriers to learning and teaching. The latest of these briefs focuses on:
|
As Congress approaches the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (currently called the No Child Left Behind Act), there is considerable evidence that there will be too little discussion on how best to address barriers to learning and teaching.
The failure to deal with this arena is seen in virtually every discussion anticipating the reauthorization. See our analysis of this matter ("Legislation in Need of Improvement: Reauthorizing the No Child Left Behind Act to Better Address Barriers to Learning" – http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu/pdfdocs/nclbra.pdf)
As it stands, many groups are mobilizing to deal with the widespread concerns related to assessment/testing. But, unless something significant is done soon, the essential matter of directly and comprehensively addressing barriers to teaching and learning will again get short shrift (and many students will continue to be left behind). In this respect, the issues before us are what is the best strategy to pursue in terms of content and process.
With respect to content, some of us think there is a need for major new sections in the law to promote development of a comprehensive system of learning supports at every school. Others are advocating mainly for some specific changes in current language or for an enhanced focus on a specific type of barrier.
As to process, no one seems to be offering strategic ideas about how to ensure this fundamental equity matter is included as a major agenda item during the Congressional hearings.
Where do you stand on these matters? (What strategies do you see as most effective? What are the organizations to which you belong planning to do to influence the reauthorization?) Let us hear from you. Ltaylor@ucla.edu
| In addition, see the list of Emerging Issues identified over the years by the Center and used as a stimulus for discussion on our Net Exchange - http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu/newnetexchange.htm |
Past policy issues analysis Briefs:
- Grade Retention: What's the Prevailing Policy and What Needs to be Done?
- Suicide Prevention in Schools
- Should Policy Specify a Formal Role for Schools Related to Mental Health?
- Screening Mental Health Problems in Schools
School Mental Health Project-UCLA
Center for Mental Health in Schools
WebMaster: Perry Nelson (smhp@ucla.edu)
